Friends, Enemies, and Internet Losers: I have returned.

Posts tagged “vancouver island

Skaught Free Live at BSC Studios


RadioBSC / BSCTV Episode #3: Behind the Curtain

This week, our overeager host overbooks the studio and sits down with Basil Ketchen, a self-declared, urban explorer AND Kara Bean and Dirty Swagger (aka Free Cigarettes for Drunk Minors). All four chat about the hidden Vancouver and the local music scene.
Features music by local artists The Likely Rads, Vancouver Killing Spree, Murder She Wrote, Dirty and the Derelicts, Jaded Jinas, The Subhumans (Vancouver), The Jolts, and Free Cigarettes for Drunk Minors.

Listen to or download the full audio podcast from below:

Listen to this episode

Download this episode (right click and save)

Watch the videotaped interview here:

The Courtenay House Manifesto


The Text


Author’s Note

On Sunday, December 9th, 2007, developers and the City of Courtenay tore down the Courtenay Hotel, an iconic old building that had stood in Courtenay since the turn of the 20th century, before there was officially a Courtenay to stand in.

For the past few years, the Courtenay Hotel was home to the Courtenay House, Courtenay’s lone strip club. It was somewhat affectionately known to one and all as the CoHo.

For most of the years that I lived in Courtenay, I was the CoHo’s unofficial Writer-in-Residence. I held court in the smoking room, watching not the young women on stage, but watching and conversing with those who had come to watch the exotic entertainment.

It was during a single afternoon in the smoking room with a handful of beers that the following was written.

I have half-jokingly dubbed what follows as “The Courtenay House Manifesto.”

It is important to note that physical, mental, and emotional “differences” often referred to in the piece that follows, exist only within the first premise that there is only one race: the Human Race. Any attempt to use the following treatise as ammunition to further the cause of racial supremacy is misguided and not in any way they intention for which they were first put to paper.





At first glance, this treatise may seem to be an invitation to elitism, and perhaps nihilism. But I would suggest that it is instead a plea for realism.

Acceptance has become a dirty word (for instance, the acceptance of Darwin’s theories is only a refutation of Creationism. In this case, as with many, acceptance is not the adoption of one set of ideas but the denial of another. No positive life outlook can be based on a negative). Acceptance must be a step forward towards a greater understanding. Too many of us believe that acceptance is on par with settling for. Acceptance is an act of realism and thereby, freedom. With the loss of superfluous desires, true freedom, mental freedom can exist. When we cease to covet and desire that which we absolutely cannot have, we are free to enjoy that which we do.

Inane maxims, such as “The truth hurts,” circulate unabated with all of us refusing to admit the deeper “truth” it speaks. Neither believing a lie, nor disbelieving a fact, amount to anything but a regrettable waste of mental energy.

For us to continue as a species, we must accept, against all influences to do otherwise, that Life is not fair and owes us nothing. Life, as we live it, is an arbitrary existence. As long as “Life” exists, it will exist without our personal input and never acknowledge that we are here beyond the original “gift” of our existence.

These theses are not the sum total of my knowledge or feelings on the subject of human existence. They also represent the ideas of others before me. This is only my work insofar as I have taken the time to compile these opinions and thoughts on their ideas.

Should this diatribe ever reach a set of eyes other than my own, I shall be assailed for its unmitigated pessimism. I am not a pessimist. I am a non-practicing, lapsed optimist.

These are general statements based on my current disgust at the state of the Human Race. All I will say in my defence is that the document can speak on its own behalf. I do not speak to the exception; I speak to the rule. A lucky few have survived a fall from great heights but most do not.

The body of this first draft was composed chain smoking in a bar, surrounded by men and women watching young women remove their clothes while pandering to the original drive to make money for others.


September 9th, 2006


The Courtenay House Manifesto


Somewhere along the line, human beings got it in their heads that they were special. We began with our assumed domination over the animals and the rest of nature. It can be said that Adam’s naming of the animals gave him power over them. By defining what something is, we assume the power and jurisdiction to do so.



Now humankind has taken on a new target: its own existence. The right to claim individual freedom, so long fought for, now threatens to destroy the fabric of our society. The right to choose and/or act does not inherently hold the right to deserve or possess that which is not yours by either necessity or ability.



Human beings, though unlimited in thought and desire, are strictly limited on other levels. Thus, the mere fact that one desires something is no guarantee that one could or should attain it. Such humans can only see life and existence as it applies only to them: they demand through solipsistic deeds that the statement above is untrue. This is the beginning of our fall.



The human beings’ fallacious belief in their dominion over existence merely perpetuates an atmosphere of falsity on one side and disappointment on the other, fostering a prevailing mood of anger and unrest. We are becoming a society of malcontents.



The wealthy seek more wealth through exploitation and corrupt means. They are fooled into believing that their relative comfort is evidence that they have a good life. No life can be good that rests on the shoulders of destruction and slavery. The unknown or, more likely, ignored cost of this “good life” those whose believe they are living the “good life” are either ignorant or uncaring, neither of which is a trait of “good life.”



We are all animals fooled into believing that we are better than we are. Our ability to reason, though rarely used, sets us apart, in our terms, from the other animal species. It does not set us above. A human being would lose a physical contest with almost any animal that matched it for weight. In terms of survival, we are poor animals indeed. Our reliance on gadgetry over common sense only exacerbates this situation.



Try as we might to control our natural surroundings, we are perennial losers to the value neutral, natural event: the earthquake, the tidal wave, the tornado, etc.



How are we as a society to survive in this world unless it is together as a unified society? The obvious and undeniable answer is that we cannot; we will not.



Human beings’ greatest failure is our inability to either recognize or accept that we are nature. Our existence began on and with this planet. We are part of the machine.



Despite our grandiose assumptions, we too are value neutral. Our necessity of existence is grossly estimated, again by assumptions of rank. There is absolutely nothing on this planet not of our creation or design that requires our existence upon it. The human being, unlike a vast majority of other animals, survives as a parasite.



Most of our energies are spent trying to rationalize our need to exist. We fail to acknowledge that we exist through happenstance, not through necessity.



I have too often heard it said that “it is better for a thousand guilty men to go free than to have one innocent man go to jail.” This is asinine thinking. It could be foolish hope that an innocent man will always find his vindication, but to believe that it is better for a thousand guilty men to walk the streets is indicative of the individual’s selfish belief that society exists solely to serve them and no other. When an individual believes that society must give only, thereby implying that society serves them and thus they are better than society, the observer must ask: how long could said individual exist without society’s gifts?



Communities exist on mutual co-operation. No one person can demand or expect to receive more than they are willing to give.



Abuse of the system is rampant and many benefit more from the same society that neglects others. For this to stop, we must construct a societal system based on the juxtaposition of true merit and necessity.



A truly meritorious system will only be realized when we are ready to admit that divisions in society must exist. Differences in relative strength, intellect, and ability, by nature, do exist. These differences must be acknowledged and, more importantly, accepted. Until this acceptance occurs, society will be plagued by malcontents whose unattainable dreams continue to be unfulfilled. Life can be “what you make it” but only after realizing that every finished product is, and can only be, the sum of its material parts. This being the case, however, a being that cannot change itself or its lot in life should never be exploited because of it.



No building is ever built exactly as it was originally designed. The construction process is rife with unforeseen circumstances and events, consisting of both positive and negative outcomes, differing from the original blueprint. There is far less control over a human’s life construction than that of a building. We build what we can, given the resources we have. But it must be realized that these are resources of the self. They are not external resources we believe to have dominion over and claim to due some self delusional assumptions of rank. When builders create from ill-suited material, the soundness is, and will always be, suspect and flawed.



Failure to acknowledge the divisions in society results in untold amounts of wasted energy. There is no waste in self-improvement. In fact, I’d argue the success of a society relies on it. For this self-improvement to have any real value at all it must be done with an eye to improving society as a whole, not merely one’s place in it.



Many claims are made by the wealthy that they are improving society. These claims almost invariably involved perceived financial benefits, the bottom line. There is more to a good existence than money. This is an alien idea to those who have and live for money. To steal a phrase: to a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.



Though the sums are obscene, philanthropy is rare. Despite the lip service often given to alleviating the suffering, torment, and exploitation of the poor, the attempts made never risk the ridiculously high standard of living enjoyed by those making the offer.



Though the intent of charity can be genuine, the nature of charity is now perverted. Countless people have a picture of a horribly distressed child from a “Third World” nation posted with pride on their refrigerator. They feel a sense of pride, an alleviation of guilt, for the dollar a day they spend sending the child the necessities of life over and over again. What this false sense of accomplishment obfuscates is the horribly obvious fact that this child is not supplied the necessities of life by those whose duty it is to do so. The child, no doubt, resides in a country impoverished by corrupt leadership, a corrupt leadership financed by greed driven corporate interests. It is ironically this greed that supplies the liquid cash that allow those “better off’ to help better the life of said child. They pat themselves on the back for pitifully trying to alleviate a situation they are to blame for. We must save our “dollars” and actually change his world rather than satisfying the need to feel good about our blood money.



Religious charity is a cruel hoax. Churches, all churches, spread their faith and charity merely as a means to maintain their power, real or assumed. God is not “dead”; God never existed. Religion is merely the tool of simple men, used to subjugate the weak, ignorant, and superstitious. No progress can be achieved until we condemn and eradicate the “teachings” of those whose knowledge never surpassed the practical, who sought only dominion over their surroundings and consolidation of their power.



Religion manifests in a multitude of guises. The latest is consumer materialism. The superfluous has become a commodity. Our lives are consumed by the desire to acquire meaningless trinkets. This has created a self-perpetrating maelstrom. As we descend further into self-gratification through material objects, human relations degrade. Lamenting degraded human relations, we find more and more comfort in these ridiculous and, ultimately, pointless pursuits.